Tuesday, 31 May 2016

This Guy Face-Swapped On Snapchat With Two Celebrities And Now The Police Are Involved

This is how you become the top news story in India overnight.

Last week, Mumbai-based comedian Tanmay Bhat posted a Snapchat video on his Facebook that went viral in India. It was shared over a thousand times and set off a national debate about feminism and equality.

Last week, Mumbai-based comedian Tanmay Bhat posted a Snapchat video on his Facebook that went viral in India. It was shared over a thousand times and set off a national debate about feminism and equality.

Facebook: tanmaycomedy

"If you believe that men and women should have equal rights, that's it. That's what makes you a feminist. That's it. There's nothing else," he said in the video.

Bhat is the founder of a mega-popular YouTube-based comedy troupe called All India Bakchod. BuzzFeed News spoke to the group last summer while they were in the middle of a legal battle. The group had been accused of breaking obscenity laws and formally charged with offending religious sentiments after organizing India's first celebrity roast.

Facebook: tanmaycomedy

Unfortunately for Bhat, the feminism controversy brought more attention to his Snapchat videos. A few days later, he decided to share a Snapchat face-swap Story titled "Sachin vs Lata Civil War," which sparked even more controversy.

Unfortunately for Bhat, the feminism controversy brought more attention to his Snapchat videos. A few days later, he decided to share a Snapchat face-swap Story titled "Sachin vs Lata Civil War," which sparked even more controversy.

Facebook: video.php

The video was a Captain America: Civil War parody, where Bhat swapped faces as renowned Indian cricketer Sachin Tendulkar and legendary Indian playback singer Lata Mangeshkar. The face-swapped celebrities argue with each other in a curse-filled back and forth. At one point Bhat's Tendulkar says that Mangeshkar looks "5,000 years old." In response, Bhat as Mangeshkar raises his middle finger to the camera.

"I obviously love Lata and Sachin, just having some fun," Bhat wrote in the caption of the video.


View Entire List ›



via BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1TUo8j4

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

Friday, 27 May 2016

Chewbacca Mask Mom Dishes On Her Viral Success, And Choice Of Streaming Platform

Last Thursday, Candace Payne walked out of a Kohl's department store and joyfully unboxed a talking Chewbacca mask while streaming it on Facebook Live. More than 150 million views later, Payne is a star.

The Texas mother of two spent the past week visiting Good Morning America, Lucasfilm's San Francisco campus, and Facebook headquarters. And she's racked up more than 700,000 Facebook followers in the process.

"My world is officially the weirdest thing in the entire galaxy," Payne said in a subsequent Facebook Live stream this week.

During Payne's visit to Facebook, she spent a few minutes talking with BuzzFeed News about her viral success and the source of her contagious joy (the full interview is posted above). "When you really know who you are, you don't have to impress anybody. Not even yourself. You can laugh at yourself and it's okay. It really is," she said.

Asked why she chose Facebook over other live streaming platforms, Payne attributed it to the network.

"That other streaming service didn't have as many friends as this one," she said, referring to the Twitter-owned Periscope. "Facebook already has built-in followers, and friends and family. So, when they came out with [live streaming], it was just a natural transition to say, 'Well why won't I use that? I mean, everybody that I know is already on there.'"

Asked if it juiced Payne's reach in any way, Facebook said her video wasn't treated any differently in its system.

"We think it really resonated with people because it was such a joyful, authentic, and funny live video," a Facebook spokesperson said. "It was like discovering a breath of fresh air right in News Feed, and it was really hard not to laugh out loud along with Candace."



via BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1OSC6xx

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

Apple Removed This Lesbian Couple From International Versions Of Its Ad

The couple has disappeared from the French, German, Italian, Turkish, and Japanese versions of a Mother's Day video the iPhone-maker published.

To celebrate Mother's Day, Apple published a special video on its official YouTube channels as "a tribute to all mothers through the eyes of iPhone users worldwide."

youtube.com

youtube.com

youtube.com


View Entire List ›



via BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1WqzW04

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

After One Year And 200 Million Users, Here's What Google Photos Could Do Next

Anil Sabharwal, vice president of Photos at Google.

Stephen Lam for BuzzFeed News


Almost one year ago, Google launched a new photo management application — Google Photos — for both the iPhone and Android. It's been a hit. Last week, at its Google I/O developer conference, the company said the app has already amassed 200 million users. "I think it makes us one of the fastest growing consumer products in history," said Anil Sabharwal, who runs Google Photos. And in an interview with BuzzFeed News looking back on the past year, Sabharwal suggested ways Google Photos might continue to change and evolve.

Smarter Storage

One of the app's main purposes is to help people back up all of their photos. Whether you're using iOS or Android, every single picture you take on your phone is automatically backed up to Google's servers. And Google Photos does this with an eye toward eliminating duplicates. It automatically deletes photos you've already backed up to free up space on your device. And it's deleted a lot of photos.

"In the year since we've launched, we've freed up 13.7 petabytes of storage on people's phones," Sabharwal told BuzzFeed News. "For a lot of our users this was incredibly valuable because they were running out of space on their devices."

Sabharwal said many of the people using this Google Photos feature live in developing markets, and own phones that don't have a lot of storage space to begin with. And so he pointed to a future in which Google might use artificial intelligence to determine whether a photo needs to be backed up at all before it's deleted. "How can [people] free up space even when they have not backed up?" Sabharwal said. "You can imagine us doing things like deleting blurry photos or deleting duplicates."

Google Assistant

Another core feature of Google Photos is Google Assistant (which is now making its way throughout Google). Assistant will do things like automatically categorize photos into themed groupings — it will automatically find and group all your photos of beaches, for example. It also will group people together using face matching, and, because you tag those people by name, it then lets you do things like search "John at the beach" and find all your photos of, well, John at the beach. Google Photos can even use those groupings — say you take a bunch of photos at a specific beach on a specific weekend — to automatically generate albums and movies and collages and GIFs.

Google refers to these auto-generated moments as "creations." According to Sabharwal, the company has made 1.6 billion of them in the past year and has big plans to do more. "I think there's a really great opportunity to mix the machine learning and creations together," he said. "One [creation] we love is the concept of 'rediscover this day' — where we present to our users meaningful moments on a particular date in previous years. Rather than 'here's what happened a year ago,' it's here's a set of photos from the last time you were with these people, or the last time you were at this restaurant."

Sabharwal also said Photos might become smarter about the albums and movies it creates by giving them a stronger perspective and point of view. It might, for example, automatically select a wedding shot in which you and your partner are looking at each other for the hero shot in an anniversary album.

Smarter Sharing

Another of the three key pillars of Google Photos — along with storage and organization — is sharing. The feature is designed so that anyone you share photos with can, in a single click, automatically add those photos to their own libraries. People can form shared albums with multiple contributors. Photos can easily be exported to other apps and services, like Facebook or Gmail. But Sabharwal told BuzzFeed News there are improvements yet to be done here as well, specifically around person-to-person proximity sharing.

"Twenty-five million photos a week are shared by Bluetooth," Sabharwal said. "There are a lot of bandwidth-sensitive markets. If you and I are standing next to each other and I've got a great photo and you want that photo, why would I spend data — which is a significant fraction of my disposable income — to send it?"

"If you think of that as a glimpse into where we're going, you can see us investing in that experience to make it easier and better," he continued. "How do we make proximity sharing easier? How do we help you to remember to share? How do we make it so every time I take a photo of my daughter, it's shared with my wife?"

Sabharwal pointed to Nearby, a new project designed to help people share and communicate when in near proximity, also announced at Google I/O, as one possible solution for that.

"Rather than sharing to an app or a destination," Sabharwal said, "we're thinking about how we're sharing with people. That's the idea we're building on."






via BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1X1jKTB

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

Do You Know What Happened In Tech The Week Of May 23?

New smartphones, Google wins a trial, and the tragic loss of our favorite Snapchat filters.



via BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/24bK7Vu

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

Sean Parker Denies Being Mystery Friend In Peter Thiel's Secret War On Gawker

Sean Parker

Angela Weiss / Getty Images

Following questions raised about his role in a secret, years-long anti-Gawker Media campaign, Sean Parker denied being the person who encouraged tech billionaire and PayPal founder Peter Thiel to secretly finance a series of lawsuits against the company, including one brought by Hulk Hogan that resulted in a $140 million judgement.

Parker and Thiel were both involved early on in Facebook. Parker is the company's former president, and Thiel, its first investor, still sits on its board. Parker and Thiel subsequently worked together at Thiel's Founder's Fund, where Parker was a managing partner.

Parker's name came up following a New York Times story published on Wednesday, in which Thiel admitted to being the person who had financed the Hogan suit. Thiel said he was motivated by a 2007 story that outed him as being gay, as well as a series of articles about his friends. He also told the Times that one friend, in particular, urged him to take action.

Mr. Thiel said that he had decided several years ago to set his plan in motion. "I didn't really want to do anything," he said. "I thought it would do more harm to me than good. One of my friends convinced me that if I didn't do something, nobody would."

In response to the revelation, Gawker founder and CEO Nick Denton wrote an open letter to Thiel on Thursday. In it, he suggests that Parker may have been one of the friends Thiel refers to that was a subject of Gawker's stories. And later, among a series of "pointed and immediate" questions, Denton asks "Is Sean Parker the friend you mentioned that persuaded you to pursue this campaign?" But Parker says it wasn't him.

"I didn't know he was doing this until very recently, so I'm not the person Nick Denton was talking about," Parker told BuzzFeed News in a text message. Previously, a Parker representative told Fusion that he had played no role in the litigation against Gawker.

So it seems at least one of Denton's questions has been answered. That just leaves nine more to go.



via BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1senQuk

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

Thursday, 26 May 2016

Will Mark Zuckerberg Vote For Peter Thiel Now?

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who is now perhaps the most powerful man in publishing, will be forced next month to decide the fate of a board member who engineered a decade-long secret campaign against a media company.

Zuckerberg, who controls the majority of Facebook's stockholder voting power, will have his own up-or-down vote at the company's June 20th stockholder meeting on Peter Thiel, who is listed as being up for reelection on Facebook's preliminary proxy statement. Thiel, an early Facebook investor and key player in its early power struggles, confirmed this week that he financed lawsuits against Gawker media as "deterrence" after the company reported that he is gay.

The stakes are high for Zuckerberg because of the power he has accreted in digital publishing, an industry in which Gawker is both a lightning rod and a pioneer. Gawker is, in fact, a Facebook partner, and one of many participants in its Instant Articles program. Facebook is the world's most important filter of information and increasingly the driving force in the way people get their news. Yet so far Zuckerberg has remained silent on his board member's actions. BuzzFeed News' requests for an interview were turned down along with those of many other media organizations.

Whether or not Zuckerberg is forced to address the Thiel situation at the 11 a.m. stockholder meeting at the Sofitel San Francisco Bay in Redwood City, his thumbs up, or down, vote will be the most forceful statement he can make about his board member — a man who some argue is setting a chilling precedent for media companies who publish stories not to the liking of powerful billionaires.

Will Facebook, a company dependent on publishers for the content that fuels its News Feed, stand by a board member seeking the destruction of one of those very publishers?

Facebook is used by more than 1 billion people every day, but as it has moved from personal content toward what the company refers to as "public content," it has moved huge audiences to publishers — and become responsible for a significant share of many publishers' traffic. Its influence is so vast that many such publishers (including BuzzFeed) have agreed to host their articles directly on Facebook's servers via the Instant Articles product. That outsized influence on how people all across the world are informed is why a major firestorm ensued after curators of its Trending column were accused of bias. After that episode, Zuckerberg said the company had a trust problem with conservatives it needed to address. His vote on Thiel will send another message about how he sees publishers.

Contributing: William Alden



via BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1P2cuUr

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

Univision Is Not Bidding To Buy Gawker

Nick Denton, founder of Gawker

POOL New / Reuters

Univision is not among the bidders to buy Gawker, sources familiar with the deal told BuzzFeed News. Earlier today, the New York Post reported that Gawker founder Nick Denton was looking to sell after the media company was ordered to pay $140 million in damages to Hulk Hogan for posting portions of sex tape.

The Post reported that one party had expressed interest in buying Gawker with a deal worth $50 million to $70 million and that Univision was one possible bidder. One source told BuzzFeed that Univision is actively pursuing how to expand its portfolio, but under recent conditions will not be bidding to buy Gawker, although the source did not rule out a bid in the future. Another source close to the Univision side said that the only negotiations were over a Spanish-language version of verticals like Gizmodo and Lifehacker. Univision has previously worked on Spanish-language sites for Variety and Atlantic City Labs.

Yesterday, Silicon Valley venture capitalist Peter Thiel, who sits on the board of Facebook and once served as CEO of PayPal, admitted that he has been financing lawsuits against Gawker with the hopes of crippling the media company. Thiel told Dealbook that he had paid about $10 million to finance claims from the wrestler, whose real name is Terry Gene Bollea. Dealbook spelled out the billionaire Libertarian's secretive legal machinations, but did not include comment on Thiel's pledge as a delegate for Donald Trump.

In April, Bloomberg reported that Univision was aiming for an IPO in the second half of the year that could raise as much as $1 billion. Before the verdict in the Hogan trial, Denton sold a minority stake in the company to Columbus Nova Technology Partners. According to the Post, Columbus purchased a mi nority stake in Gawker for $100 million, however Politico says the amount was "far less."

Disclosure: Nitasha Tiku is a former Gawker employee.



via BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1UgrPj5

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

Oslo Freedom Forum Founder Says Thiel "Has Every Right" To Fund Media Lawsuits

Thor Halvorssen, center, during a press conference at the War Memorial of Korea in Seoul.

Jung Yeon-je / AFP / Getty Images

Billionaire investor Peter Thiel has at least one civil society ally defending his financing of lawsuits against Gawker Media: the founder of the New York-based Human Rights Foundation, which has received at least $900,000 in funding from Thiel.

"Peter Thiel is a free man in a free society, and he has every right to engage in third party litigation financing if he wants to," Human Rights Foundation founder Thor Halvorssen told BuzzFeed News. "If he thinks that Gawker should be hauled into court and sued for what he believes is wrongdoing, and he is willing to finance the effort, that's between Peter Thiel and whoever is prosecuting the lawsuit. There appears to be nothing illegal in Thiel's conduct."

Halvorssen was speaking by phone from the sidelines of the Oslo Freedom Forum, an annual gathering of activists, dissidents and journalists that is put on by his foundation. He described Thiel as a "visionary, an innovator, and a person of principle."

Thiel's ideas have influenced the Venezuelan-Norwegian activist in ways beyond the political or ideological. In a 2013 profile, Halvorssen told BuzzFeed News that he got the idea to cryogenically freeze his body after death from the Facebook board member.

Forbes and the New York Times reported Tuesday that Thiel has helped fund a lawsuit against Gawker by Terry Bollea — aka Hulk Hogan — stemming from the site's publication of an excerpt of a sex tape featuring the wrestler.

Hogan won a $140 million judgment in the suit, which a Florida Circuit Court judge recently upheld. Gawker is appealing. "We trust the appeals court will correct the outsized Florida jury verdict and reaffirm the law that protects a free and critical press, which is more embattled and important than ever," Gawker said in a statement Wednesday.

Thiel says advocates for a free press should not fear his approach to funding lawsuits. "I refuse to believe that journalism means massive privacy violations," he told the New York Times in an interview published Wednesday night. "I think much more highly of journalists than that. It's precisely because I respect journalists that I do not believe they are endangered by fighting back against Gawker."

Joel Simon, the executive director of The Committee to Protect Journalists, which has also received funding from Thiel, put out a statement Wednesday saying that while the organization supports people's rights to pursue defamation claims, "we do not support efforts to abuse the process by seeking to punish or bankrupt particular media outlets." Thiel has not donated to CPJ or HRF since 2013 and 2014 respectively.

Halvorssen, who spoke to BuzzFeed News before Thiel's Times interview was published, acknowledged that "defamation lawsuits are often used to silence journalists engaged in whistleblowing and uncovering malfeasance and political corruption," but argued that in Gawker's case, "this does not seem to be one such lawsuit."

Gawker has the "right to publish what they wish," Halvorssen said, and in return "they might be held accountable in a court of law."

In an interview with The Street in 2011, Thiel said he supported the Human Rights Foundation and the Oslo Freedom Forum "because their focus on dissidents engages the intellectual debate as well as the moral cause."



via BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/22pNKrz

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

Sarah Jessica Parker And Her Friends Still Use Blackberries

VINTAGE!

Sarah Jessica Parker's Instagram is a treasure trove. And last night she Instagrammed something so revealing, that we need to discuss here. Here is the photo that was shared:

Instagram: @sarahjessicaparker

TURNS OUT SJP AND HER FRIENDS STILL USE BLACKBERRIES.

TURNS OUT SJP AND HER FRIENDS STILL USE BLACKBERRIES.

instagram.com

You know, the iconic phone that was able to signify how cool you were based on number of BBM contacts.

You know, the iconic phone that was able to signify how cool you were based on number of BBM contacts.

Sorry, but it's true.

crazy-frankenstein.com

Since the phone is basically a vintage piece now, it makes total sense that SJP AKA Carrie Bradshaw would have it.

Since the phone is basically a vintage piece now, it makes total sense that SJP AKA Carrie Bradshaw would have it.

instagram.com


View Entire List ›



via BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1WTvJT1

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

Burned

Aaron Fernandez/BuzzFeed News

Until he lost an eye, April 15 was a good day for Joseph Cavins.

The 63-year-old Orange, California, family therapist saw a full slate of clients. It was two days before tax day, so he caught up on records from his practice. After work, he hung out with some friends. And he wound his day down in the usual way: by playing a game of solitaire on his computer while he enjoyed a few drags off one of his e-cigarettes, which he had been using nearly every day for two years.

At around 10:30 p.m., as Cavins turned his head toward a nearby bookcase, he heard a "very loud bang" and felt as if he had been struck in the face by a hockey stick. A fire smoldered on his desk. He held his hands to his face and discovered that "there was a lot of blood and fluid coming out." He began to scream: "No! No!" He couldn't see out of his left eye.

Cavins smothered the fire and woke his wife. At the hospital, doctors found that the explosion had caused extensive damage to his eyeball: Several cuts had pierced his iris and cornea, and they went all the way to the socket. The doctors recommended a surgical "evisceration": the removal of the eye. Sitting in the emergency room, Cavins began to process what had happened: His vaporizer, the device he had bought as a "nice, clean way to get nicotine," had exploded into his face.

He wasn't alone. Across the country, defective e-cigarettes — the nicotine delivery machines that have taken over every strip mall and sidewalk, seemingly overnight — are creating hundreds of victims like Cavins, people whose lives are suddenly and horrifyingly changed when their devices blow up. They are people like Thomas Boes, whose vape exploded while he was driving outside San Diego and struck him with such force that two of the three teeth he lost lodged in his upper palate; Kenneth Barbero, whose exploding device ripped a hole in his tongue; and Marcus Forzani, a 17-year-old whose left leg was charred from his calf to his thigh after a vape battery exploded in his pocket. An unpublished FDA analysis found 66 reports of e-cigarette overheating, fires, and explosions in 2015 and the first month of 2016, a number the agency calls "an underestimate of actual events."

Until very recently a totally unregulated $3.7 billion industry, e-cigarettes are widely expected to surpass traditional tobacco products in sales within the next decade. Responding to intense — if tempered — consumer demand and unencumbered by rules, hundreds of small distributors have over the past five years rushed devices, mostly imported from China, to market. Thousands of small stores have cropped up to sell them. According to a 2015 CDC survey, nearly 13% of Americans had tried an e-cigarette in their lifetime and there are more than 9 million adults who use e-cigs regularly; those numbers have almost surely gone up since.

The industry has grown so rapidly in part by claiming health benefits over traditional cigarette smoking, namely that it is safer to inhale the vapor produced by heating a nicotine solution than it is to inhale the 7,000 chemicals dispensed by a paper cigarette. Indeed, most of the concern and debate over e-cigarettes has focused on the relative merit of those claims.

Joseph Cavins

Gregory L. Bentley

Much less of the public debate has focused on the devices themselves, which have demonstrably maimed dozens, and probably maimed hundreds, including Cavins, Boes, and Barbero. Recently, though, personal injury lawyers across the country have started to take notice.

"The batteries are exploding due to an unclean manufacturing process at dirty, unsanitary facilities in China," said Gregory Bentley, a California lawyer who represents 62 people who have been injured by exploding e-cigarettes. "That's as a result of people trying to rush these products to the marketplace." Because it's nearly impossible to sue a Chinese manufacturer, Bentley and other plaintiffs' attorneys have focused on the American distributors and sellers who make money off of the devices. Bentley's firm, Shernoff Bidart Echeverria Bentley, was the first to reach a verdict against a seller of e-cigarettes, in October of last year.

Bentley is correct that the direct cause of these explosions is an overheated lithium ion battery, but the science behind the trigger for these so-called thermal events is still something of a mystery. The first problem, and one reason lithium ion failures in e-cigs may be more dangerous than in, say, computers, is their shape. According to a 2014 report by the U.S. Fire Administration, the cylindrical design of e-cigs makes them particularly dangerous in the event of overheating: "As a result of the battery and container failure, one or the other, or both, can be propelled across the room like a bullet or small rocket." That's why, in both Cavins' and Boes' cases, the explosion turned the devices into projectiles.

But what causes the failure in the first place? According to Venkat Viswanathan, a professor of mechanical engineering at Carnegie Mellon who studies lithium ion batteries, extremely low failure rates — somewhere between one in a million and one in a billion — make it difficult to determine.

"That's the challenge of large numbers. It's hard to prove," said Viswanathan. "We would have to test a million cells and see what is going on. The only way to find out is to put a million products in the hands of consumers."

Which is, more or less, what's going on in the market today. That's where Glen Stevick, a mechanical engineer and failure analyst at Berkeley Engineering and Research (BEAR), comes in: He's the Sherlock Holmes of lithium ion batteries, running postmortems on explosions like the one that partially blinded Joseph Cavins. BEAR has investigated more than two dozen such cases. According to Stevick, the real problem is that many of the e-cigarettes on the market today lack the electronics, both in the devices themselves and in the chargers, to prevent both dangerously high-voltage charging and equally dangerous low-voltage discharge. Each of these states — too high and too low — can ultimately lead to short-circuiting, overheating, and, ultimately, explosion.

Better preventative measures would likely stop hot batteries from ever getting to the point where a thermal event reaches "runway." These include circuits that regulate charging; a stiff, hollow core on the inside of the battery that sloughs off extra energy; and a switch that causes the battery to lose conductivity at certain levels of heat. Of course, those preventative measures cost money. The e-cig business in America has been defined by its prolificacy: A 2014 report found that there were 466 brands of e-cigarettes on the market, a number that was increasing by an average of 10.5 brands a month. Many of these companies are small and have to skimp on quality to compete with larger manufacturers.

"Some companies get really good batteries at a cheap price," said Viswanathan. "Smaller-scale device makers don't have the same luxury. They have to lean on low-quality suppliers."

Thomas Boes

Gregory L. Bentley

"The FDA has taken a good first step, but it's clearly not enough."

Earlier this month, the FDA announced a long-awaited set of rules that extended its authority to all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes. Crucially, the new federal rules include not just the tobacco solution, but components and parts as well. These rules will require e-cigarette makers to submit premarket tobacco applications to the agency, a process that the FDA estimates costs "in the low hundreds of thousands of dollars." According to Michael Felberbaum, an FDA press officer, the agency recommends that the applications include information about under- or over-voltage lockout protections.

"The FDA has taken a good first step, but it's clearly not enough," said Bentley, Cavins' lawyer. "I believe the industry needs to put testing protocols and manufacturing guidelines in place for chargers. And to what extent they will get in and look at the factories? That's the most important process."

While American regulators won't be setting foot inside Chinese factories anytime soon, the new rules may nevertheless indirectly put a stop to the creation of substandard batteries. By forcing smaller companies, which won't be able to bear the costs of approval and higher-quality components, out of the nascent space, the FDA may eliminate cheaper batteries from the market. In other words, twin financial pressures — litigation on one end and regulation on the other — may ultimately end the problem of exploding e-cigs and make the batteries inside as safe as those in laptops and automobiles. While some have called the regulations "a gift to Big Tobacco," which will be able to bear easily the costs of premarket approval, standardizing safer batteries would be an indisputable upside of industry consolidation.

"We're making cars with 8,000 cell batteries and they're safe," said Viswanathan. "In most cases e-cigarettes have one cell."

In the meantime, there will continue to be fires and explosions, at least until a two-year FDA grace period for e-cig companies runs its course. That means likely hundreds more Americans dealing with the aftermath of life-changing injuries. That means hundreds more people like Joseph Cavins — who has quit nicotine products — who will continue to serve as a reminder that unregulated product crazes come with consequences. "I'm not coping as well as I would have liked," Cavins said of losing his eye. "But I've given myself permission to do the best I can."



via BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/22qm7hZ

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

Customers Say Postmates Has Been Underestimating Delivery Costs

Founder & CEO at Postmates Bastian Lehmann during TechCrunch Disrupt London 2015.

John Phillips / Getty Images

Lots of people seem to be having the same problem with the on-demand delivery service Postmates.

After placing an order, the company quotes an estimate for what it will cost. But after the goods are delivered, people say they end up getting charged way more than they originally agreed to:

People mostly associate Postmates, which is valued at half a billion dollars, with restaurant takeout, but the company has a lot of partnerships, including 7-Eleven and Walgreens, that allow customers to get pretty much anything delivered. While the convenience is a bonus people are willing to pay for, the frustration over being charged more than you expected to pay is a major turn-off:

Postmates acknowledged the problem to BuzzFeed News, saying it's caused by out-of-date prices for the thousands of restaurants its delivery team picks up from. "We show the price estimate, based on the menu that's in our system," wrote Postmates spokesperson April Conyers in an email, "but there may be some discrepancy."

In some cases, when there's more at play than changing menu prices, Postmates ends up giving a refund to customers — for example, when Postmates failed to inform customers that a restaurant would be charging a special fee because of the app:

Postmates offers delivery from many restaurants, some of which — unlike the partner vendors that Postmates works closely with — don't even realize they're on the platform at all. This can cause problems with food quality and supply, as well as kitchen timing.

Restaurants that don't want to be available for Postmates delivery can request to be permanently removed, Postmates said; others, like San Francisco's popular Blue Barn, charge a fee. "Last year we delivered from 100,000 merchants," said Conyers. "You can imagine, things come up."




via BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/1OZX6I5

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe