Airbnb Sues San Francisco Over Rental Rules
Justin Sullivan / Getty Images
In what Airbnb is calling an "unprecedented step," the company is suing the city of San Francisco, challenging an ordinance the startup says violates legal protections for internet platforms and its free speech rights.
The new law that trigged the dispute requires home-owners to register their rental properties with the city, with companies like Airbnb on the hook for any unregistered hosts. Passed unanimously by the Board of Supervisors earlier this year, Airbnb could be charged $1,000 per day for every host that has failed to register.
"This is an unprecedented step for Airbnb, and one we do not take lightly," the company wrote in a blog post Monday. "Unfortunately, the rules do not work. There is broad agreement that the current registration process in the City is broken."
Beset by drastic housing shortages, San Francisco officials designed the rules in part to protect the city's existing housing stock. By limiting the number of days for a short term rental and introducing a registration process, city officials sought to address criticism that rental companies like Airbnb were exacerbating the housing crises by converting affordable homes into hostels.
"There is a need for policies that protect San Francisco's housing stock and ensure the collection of hotel taxes," Airbnb wrote. But the company argues that for some of its hosts, the registration process is unworkable, describing the city's requirements as "confusing and ever-changing."
But David Campos, a member of the board of supervisors and a co-author of the new rental law dismissed Airbnb's opposition Monday evening, arguing that the lawsuit proves Airbnb "believes it's above the law."
"Airbnb wants to play by its own rules," he wrote on Twitter.
According to Campos, thousands of Airbnb's San Francisco hosts remain unregistered, which could force the company to absorb massive penalties or remove the listings from its platform when the rules kick in next month.
In its lawsuit, Airbnb claims San Francisco is at fault for violating what's known as the Communications Decency Act, a federal law that shields internet companies like YouTube, Twitter, and Yelp from being held responsible for the content posted by their users.
The city, looking to institute heightened accountability, sees things differently. "The ordinance doesn't punish platforms that host user content, Matt Dorsey, a spokesman for San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera, told Bloomberg.
"It's not regulating user content at all -- it's regulating the business activity of the hosting platform," Dorsey said.
via BuzzFeed - Tech http://ift.tt/2960Qcs
Put the internet to work for you.
No comments: